Protecting the Rights of the Accused

Akron College Student Defense Attorney – 888.506.2167

In today’s society, there seems to be a heavy prejudice against the accused from the moment they are implicated in a crime. This is no more prevalent than in sex crime cases that originate on college campuses. All universities and colleges have sections in their Student Code of Conduct Handbooks that cover sexual violations. That leaves administrations more or less free to judge and penalize a student based on nothing more than allegations. The accused student has no way of knowing how to defend themselves or what potential ramifications even the slightest misstep could have on the rest of their lives. However, the Title IX statute does provide the accused protections against an overzealous school.

At Christopher G. Thomarios, Esq. LLC, I full-heartedly believe in the unwavering importance of due process and fair treatment under the law. College rape and other sexually based accusations far too often conclude near-immediately and not in the favor of the accused. Upon inspecting the case, it is found that many errors occurred during the investigation process that unfairly tipped the scale well out of balance to benefit the accuser.

In many rape cases originating on university campuses, the follow errors or oversights occur:

  • Statement is only taken from the accuser, not also the accused.
  • Allegations by the accused against the accuser are not investigated.
  • The hearing procedures are not followed per the University’s own guidelines.
  • DNA evidence is not collected properly, or at all.
  • Accuser’s own background is never questioned – do they gain from fabricating a crime?
  • Disciplinary hearings are conducted before student can speak to counsel.
  • Statements are taken from the students without them realizing that what they say could be used against them in criminal proceedings.

If you have been accused of a sex crime on a college campus in Ohio, or anywhere in the United States, contact my office for a free case evaluation. I may be able to come to your side and provide legal guidance and representation during hearings.

Examples of colleges in the area include:

  • The University of Akron
  • Cleveland State University
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Oberlin College
  • Ohio State University
  • Ohio University

Begin your defense by contacting my firm in Akron today.

Lack of Due Process Could Invalidate Entire Case

I am highly-experienced when it comes to managing college student defense cases. I have handled a newsworthy case in which a male student’s rights were not protected, or even upheld in the slightest. The female student who accused him of violence against her and had him suspended for one year, which would have negated his ability to attend graduate school.

While disciplinary hearings and college crime investigations are already questionable, this case represents a total lack of due process by any definition. I put time, energy, and care into this case to ensure my client’s rights will be respected and he will be treated fairly under the law. In the end, my Client was able to return to school after having the suspension severely curtailed and graduated with Honors.

No One is Guilty Until Proven Innocent – Call 888.506.2167

To defeat this growing notion that the accused in college sex crime cases should be presumed guilty instead of innocent, it must be tackled head on. I am an Akron criminal defense attorney unafraid to challenge even the strongest, fiercest, and biggest of oppositions. If your rights, education, and indeed your future and reputation are being jeopardized by a one-sided “legal” system, then it is time to retain my services and empower your defense.


Contact me as soon as you can so we can start talking about your defense strategy.


Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.